Letter to the Editor

Robert Grace, Editor
Plastics News
1725 Merriman Road
Akron, Ohio 44313-5293

Dear Mr. Grace:

I know that in the interest of fair play your publication must present both sides of an issue. However, Luke Schmidt's response to the question of a bottle bill is packed with half-truths and loaded language, not responsible, accurate facts.

First, it is evident from the experience in New York State that options of either returning containers to a collection location or using the recycling program create a situation in which people recycle their containers at high rates. People will chose the option that is "convenient" for them, whether it is curbside recycling, a recycling drop-off, or the local store. The consumer chooses whether to collect the deposit or not.

Deposit laws may be inconvenient for the bottlers and stores, but they are not inconvenient for individuals and families. All containers that are recycled must be clean, no matter how they are collected, so cleanliness is moot both in the home and at the collection point.

From the story about the recent campaign in Kentucky it is obvious that the plastics and bottling industry will spend vast amounts to keep the status quo. Environmentalists and consumers be damned. I find it tiresome that the same inaccurate, emotional arguments are trotted out each time the issue is raised. Fortunately, people are not fooled and the industry's resistance only serves to make those who understand more stubborn.

Sincerely,

WESTERN FINGER LAKES
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY

Marjorie T. Haizlip
Public Relations/Education Coordinator